Skip to main content

It is better to say something !!


Is there a cause and effect in everything? There is no conclusive and definite answer to this. There are always two answers to this question. One answer is coming from the depth and the other answer is coming from the surface. The scientists believe in everything that has a cause and an effect. They strongly believe that there is no effect without a cause. They have infact done a great experiment in this direction. They created an emptiness. They removed all matter and created emptiness. And they found to their surprise that there are quantum fluctuations even in that emptiness. What caused these quantum fluctuations? They have no clue on this. There is no definite and conclusive answer for this. There is nothing in that space and still something causes these quantum fluctuations. Is emptiness really empty? Is emptiness fullness too? In fact emptiness and fullness are two perspectives of the same reality.

There is a story similar to this in the Upanishad. There was a crow and it was cawing. There was also the wind blowing. The crow sits on a tree and the fruit falls. The cawing of the crow, the blowing of the wind, the sitting of the crow on the tree, and the falling of the fruit off the tree, all these happen simultaneously. They all happen at once. The question is what caused what? What caused the fruit to fall off the tree? Has the cawing of the crow caused the fruit to fall off the tree? Is the falling of the fruit a cause for the cawing of the crow? There can not be a definite and conclusive answer to this. The duality is a manifestation of the reality. And hence there are always two answers to this. One answer is coming from the depth of the reality and the other answer is coming from the surface of the reality. At the depth of the reality the answer is, nothing is causing nothing. And at the surface of the reality the answer is, everything is causing everything. These are the only two possible answers. 

The same is true when it comes to words and silence. Has the silence caused the words or have the words caused the silence? The same is true with words and silence. Is it better to say something or just keep quiet? People say that the silence says everything. No, silence can not say everything. The silence may create a misunderstanding. The words also can create a misunderstanding. And the words can also be used to remove that misunderstanding. Therefore, it is better to say something than say nothing. Can the words say everything? No, the words can not say everything. The truth is far bigger than the words. Whatever you say, something is always left out. And it is always better to say something than say nothing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Glass, Half Full or Half Empty

The reality exists and we all perceive the reality. What is true reality? Nobody can give the exact answer. Each person has his own reality. And, therefore, each person has his own expression. The reality is one but the perceptions could be many. The reality is one but the expressions could be many. Every one perceives reality in his own way. Every observer observes reality is his own way. Every perception is relative to the one who is perceiving. Every observation is relative to the observer. The one who is perceiving and the perception are not two different things. The observer and the observed are not two different things.


Is the glass half full or half empty? This is a common phrase that we use to know an individual’s worldview. This is a common phrase that we use to know an individual’s point of view. In the above situation, every individual’s worldview could be different. One may argue and say that the glass is half full and this expression may indicate optimism. And another ma…

The Mahabharata - In a Nutshell

There are three great characters in the Mahabharata. All the other characters are just by-products of these three characters. Duryodhana, Arjuna, and Krishna are these three main and great characters. To me, Duryodhana represents the Unconscious. He is a metaphor for the Unconscious. Arjuna represents the Conscious. He is a metaphor for the Conscious. And Krishna represents the Supreme Conscious. He is a metaphor for the Supreme Conscious. He is representing the Supreme Consciousness. When the ray of the Supreme Consciousness passes through the prism of the mind, the prism of the mind manifests the Supreme Consciousness into the Consciousness and the Unconsciousness.

To make things simple, let us understand this by way of an example. Let us suppose that the Unconsciousness is like darkness and the Consciousness is like the light. And the one that joins these two and still remains beyond is called the Supreme Consciousness. According to the psychologists the Unconsciousness is far far …

A Mathematical Expression of Enlightened Leadership

I was just wondering if Enlightened Leadership can really be expressed by way of a mathematical expression. An object is a subset of the subject. There is no reason why it can not be expressed. There has to be a way to express it mathematically. The whole objective reality can be expressed mathematically. I really do not find a problem anywhere.

There are two dimensions to the existence. One is a horizontal dimension that exists in time. The whole of history, Itihasas, and the Puranas are part of it. And all these are full of symbolic and non-symbolic expressions. The other is a vertical dimension which does not exist in time. No matter we do what, this can never be expressed in terms of mathematics. This can be expressed only by way of metaphors. The Vedas and Upanishads are expressions of this timeless dimension.

It is utterly wrong to say that the door of the divine does not exist for a person who thinks in terms of mathematics. No, existence does not behave it that way. There has …